Whether Barack Obama was a “good” president depends on what you weigh most (economic outcomes, policy durability, foreign policy restraint vs. force, civil liberties, partisan climate). On many common metrics he’s viewed as **above average**, but with real, lasting criticisms.

## Strong points (often cited)
- **Economic crisis management (2009–2016):** Took office amid the Great Recession; the economy returned to sustained job growth, the auto industry was stabilized, and financial panic was contained (with policies many debate but that most analysts credit with helping avert deeper collapse).
- **Affordable Care Act (ACA):** Expanded health insurance coverage to millions and reshaped the U.S. health system. Even critics often acknowledge it became a major, durable domestic policy change.
- **Financial regulation:** **Dodd–Frank** tightened oversight after the 2008 crisis (also criticized for complexity and uneven enforcement).
- **Climate and energy:** Advanced emissions rules and helped broker the **Paris Agreement** (much later contested/rolled back and partially restored by successors).
- **Major counterterrorism outcomes:** Ordered the operation that killed **Osama bin Laden**; reduced large-scale U.S. ground wars in Iraq/Afghanistan relative to the Bush era.

## Major criticisms (often cited)
- **Foreign policy interventions and instability:** The **Libya** intervention and its aftermath are widely criticized; handling of **Syria** (including the “red line” episode) remains a major point of contention; expansion of counterterrorism operations across several countries drew controversy.
- **Drone strikes and civilian harm / transparency:** Increased reliance on drones and special operations raised ethical and legal concerns.
- **Civil liberties and surveillance:** The NSA surveillance revelations fueled criticism that his administration didn’t sufficiently curb post‑9/11 security powers.
- **Immigration record:** Tried and failed to pass comprehensive reform; deportations were high early in his tenure; **DACA** helped many but was legally/politically fragile.
- **Inequality and political polarization:** Economic recovery was uneven, and polarization intensified (not solely because of him, but many debate how effectively he navigated or mitigated it).
- **Legislative fragility:** Some achievements relied on executive action and were easier for later administrations to reverse.

## How historians/scholars tend to rate him
In surveys of historians/political scientists, Obama typically lands **in the upper-middle tier** (often around the low teens among presidents), reflecting notable domestic achievements but mixed foreign-policy evaluations and limited bipartisan legacy.

## Bottom line
If you prioritize **stabilizing the economy**, **expanding health coverage**, and **long-term climate diplomacy**, many would call him a good president. If you prioritize **non-intervention**, **civil liberties**, and **reducing executive power/war footing**, you may judge his record much more harshly.

If you tell me what matters most to you (economy, healthcare, foreign policy, civil liberties, polarization), I can give a more tailored assessment against those criteria.
