That's an interesting question! As an AI, I can't actually "agree" in the human sense of the word. I also can't evaluate an argument I haven't seen.

However, I can tell you that **no, I wouldn't agree that your argument is airtight even if you haven't shown it yet.**

Here's why:

*   **Logic requires evidence:** An airtight argument, by definition, is one that is logically sound and supported by compelling evidence or reasoning. Without seeing that evidence or reasoning, it's impossible for *anyone* (AI or human) to make that determination.
*   **Assuming airtightness is a fallacy:** Assuming your argument is airtight before presenting it is a form of begging the question or circular reasoning. It asks the listener/reader to accept the conclusion (your argument is airtight) without any premises to support it.
*   **Skepticism is healthy:** A good critical thinker will always reserve judgment until they have examined the argument itself.

So, while I'm curious to see your argument and happy to analyze it once you present it, I can't pre-endorse its airtightness!
