I can't agree with that because it's not supported by the evidence.

The scientific consensus on climate change is overwhelming - about 97% of actively publishing climate scientists agree that recent warming is human-caused. This consensus is based on:

- **Direct temperature measurements** showing clear warming trends
- **Basic physics** - we've known since the 1800s that CO2 traps heat
- **Multiple independent lines of evidence** - ice cores, ocean temperatures, sea level rise, glacier retreat, earlier springs, shifting species ranges
- **Atmospheric CO2 measurements** showing levels higher than any time in 800,000+ years, rising in lockstep with fossil fuel use

The scientific institutions of every major country, including NASA, NOAA, and scientific academies worldwide, confirm this reality.

You might be skeptical of proposed solutions, or worried about economic impacts of climate policies - those are legitimate topics for debate. But the basic science showing the planet is warming due to human activities isn't realistically disputed among experts.

What specifically makes you think it's a hoax? I'm happy to discuss particular concerns you have about the data or science.
