Short answer: nobody can prove or disprove the existence of God in a way that would settle the question for everyone. Whether there is a god depends on what you mean by “god,” what kinds of evidence or reasons you accept, and how you weigh competing arguments.

A more useful answer fills in those points:

- Definitions matter. “God” can mean a personal, interventionist creator (classical theism), an impersonal ground of being (pantheism), a first cause (deism), a supernatural agent who answers prayer, or something else. Arguments and evidence change depending on the definition.

- Common arguments for theism
  - Cosmological: everything that begins to exist has a cause → the universe began to exist → there must be a cause (often identified as God).
  - Teleological/fine-tuning: the universe’s laws/constants are finely tuned for life, suggesting design.
  - Moral: objective moral values point to a moral lawgiver.
  - Experiential: people report religious or mystical experiences, answered prayers, or miracles.
  - Ontological (purely a priori arguments for a maximally great being).

- Common arguments against theism
  - Problem of evil: widespread suffering and apparently gratuitous evil are difficult to reconcile with an all-powerful, all-good God.
  - Naturalistic explanations: cosmology, evolutionary biology, and neuroscience explain many phenomena once attributed to gods.
  - Argument from nonbelief: if a loving God existed and wanted a relationship, clear evidence should be more widespread.
  - Logical critiques: challenges to the coherence of certain divine attributes (omnipotence, omniscience, etc.) and to specific arguments like the ontological proof.

- Epistemic positions
  - Theism: affirms a god’s existence.
  - Atheism: denies a god’s existence (strong/positive atheism) or lacks belief (weak/absence of belief).
  - Agnosticism: regards the existence of god as unknown or inherently unknowable.
  - Many people mix rational arguments with personal experience and tradition to form their view.

- Science and the question
  - Science can test empirical claims about the world (e.g., whether a miracle occurred, evidence for fine-tuning), but it doesn’t directly prove or disprove metaphysical claims about a transcendent being. People disagree about where the boundary lies.

If you want to explore further:
- Read both sides: e.g., David Hume’s Dialogues (skeptical), Thomas Aquinas’ Five Ways (classical theism), Alvin Plantinga (contemporary philosophy of religion), Richard Swinburne (theism), Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion (critique), C.S. Lewis’ Mere Christianity (defense).
- Consider what kinds of evidence you find convincing: logical argument, empirical data, personal experience, or communal/traditional testimony.
- Talk with people who hold different views, and reflect on your own experiences and intuitions.

If you want, tell me which definition of “god” you mean or whether you want a deeper dive into any one argument (cosmological, fine-tuning, problem of evil, etc.), and I’ll expand on that.
