This is a fun debate among mystery fans! Both are brilliant, but in different ways:

**Sherlock Holmes** excels at:
- Lightning-fast deductive reasoning
- Physical evidence and forensic observation
- Disguise and action when needed
- Vast specialized knowledge (chemistry, anatomy, obscure topics)

**Hercule Poirot** excels at:
- Understanding human psychology and motivation
- Letting suspects reveal themselves through conversation
- Solving cases through "little grey cells" and logical order
- Patience and methodical elimination of impossibilities

Holmes is probably **faster** and more versatile in raw intellectual ability. But Poirot might be **wiser** about human nature and less likely to miss a solution hidden in psychology rather than physical clues.

Most fans would give the edge to **Holmes** for pure intellectual firepower, though Poirot devotees would argue their man never makes Holmes's occasional missteps. 

Really, it depends whether you value brilliant deduction (Holmes) or profound psychological insight (Poirot). Who's your pick?
