The question of who is smarter between Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot is an intriguing one, as both are iconic fictional detectives created by different authors with distinct styles and approaches to solving mysteries.

**Sherlock Holmes**, created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, is known for his exceptional powers of observation, logical reasoning, and deductive skills. Holmes relies heavily on scientific methods, forensic evidence, and his deep knowledge of various subjects to solve cases. He often approaches problems analytically, breaking down complex situations into smaller parts.

**Hercule Poirot**, created by Agatha Christie, is famous for his use of "the little grey cells"—his emphasis on psychology, understanding human nature, and the motivations behind crimes. Poirot tends to focus on the behavior, psychology, and intentions of suspects rather than just physical evidence. He combines intuition with methodical reasoning.

### Comparing Their Intellects:
- **Analytical ability**: Holmes excels in detailed, scientific analysis, often noticing clues others miss.
- **Psychological insight**: Poirot specializes in understanding the mindsets and emotional factors influencing suspects.
- **Approach**: Holmes is more empirical and evidence-driven; Poirot is more psychological and holistic.

### Conclusion:
Both detectives are brilliant but in different ways. Holmes might be considered "smarter" in terms of raw observation and forensic science, while Poirot might have an edge in psychological intelligence and interpersonal understanding. Ultimately, they complement different facets of genius, and fans of detective fiction often appreciate each for their unique strengths rather than directly comparing them.

Who do you lean toward as the smarter detective?
