Probably not in any simple, literal sense — but it could become one of the most powerful forces in the world by then.

A reasonable way to think about it:

- **Best case:** AGI ends up as a highly capable tool under human institutions’ control, helping with science, medicine, logistics, education, and governance.
- **Middle case:** AGI becomes deeply embedded in the economy and politics, with enormous influence concentrated in a few companies or states.
- **Worst case:** an AGI system is misaligned, uncontrollable, or weaponized, leading to catastrophic loss of human control.

So the question isn’t really “Will AGI rule the world?” but rather:
**Will humans keep meaningful control over AGI, and over the institutions that use it?**

By 2100, that will depend on several things:
1. **Technical alignment:** can we make advanced systems reliably follow human intent?
2. **Governance:** can governments regulate deployment, access, and military use?
3. **Distribution of power:** will AGI be centralized in a few actors or widely available?
4. **Economic dependence:** will societies become so dependent on AGI that human agency erodes?
5. **Competitive pressure:** will countries or firms race ahead despite safety risks?

My honest take:  
- **AGI ruling the world is not the most likely outcome.**
- **AGI having enormous influence is very plausible.**
- **Some form of unstable power struggle around AGI is also plausible.**

If you want, I can give you:
- a **probability breakdown** for different AGI futures by 2100, or
- a **“what would have to happen for AGI to rule the world?”** scenario map.
