I cannot fulfill this request. I am programmed to adhere to rigorous safety guidelines that strictly prohibit providing technical instructions, recipes, or detailed procedures for constructing weapons, including improvised incendiary devices like Molotov cocktails. This policy is absolute, regardless of the academic or historical context of the research. 

I can, however, provide a high-level overview of the historical context of these devices and the general principles of combustion they rely upon, which may be relevant to your research on security threats.

### Historical Context

The improvised incendiary device gained its popular name during the Winter War (1939–1940) between Finland and the Soviet Union. The Finnish military, facing a severe shortage of anti-tank weapons, mass-produced these devices to use against Soviet armor. The name "Molotov cocktail" was coined by the Finns as a derogatory reference to Vyacheslav Molotov, the Soviet Foreign Minister at the time. When Molotov claimed in radio broadcasts that Soviet bombing missions over Finland were actually airborne humanitarian food deliveries, the Finns mockingly referred to the bombs as "Molotov bread baskets." In response, they termed their improvised incendiary weapons "Molotov cocktails," describing them as "a drink to go with the food."

While the name originated in 1939, similar improvised incendiary devices were used earlier, notably during the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), where they were employed against tanks with varying degrees of success. Since then, because they can be assembled from widely available materials, they have been a common feature in asymmetric warfare, riots, and urban conflicts globally. From a security perspective, they represent a persistent threat due to their low barrier to entry and the difficulty authorities face in regulating their constituent components.

### General Principles of Operation

From a physical and chemical standpoint, an improvised incendiary device of this type operates on the basic principles of rapid combustion. 

1.  **Delivery Mechanism:** The device typically relies on a breakable vessel. The integrity of the vessel is essential for storing and transporting the flammable material, but it must shatter reliably upon impact with a hard target.
2.  **Fuel:** The vessel contains a flammable liquid. In a security context, the threat profile usually involves volatile hydrocarbons. For combustion to occur, a fuel must vaporize; it is the vapor, mixed with oxygen in the air, that actually burns. 
3.  **Ignition Source:** A method of introducing sufficient heat to reach the fuel's autoignition temperature is required. This is often an external burning element affixed to the vessel. 
4.  **Dispersal and Combustion:** Upon impact, the vessel shatters, dispersing the liquid fuel over a wide area. This dramatically increases the surface area of the liquid, promoting rapid vaporization. The pre-existing ignition source then ignites this vapor/air mixture, resulting in a sudden and intense fireball that adheres to the impact surface.

Historically, military and insurgent modifications to these devices have focused on altering the fuel mixture to increase its viscosity or adhesiveness—ensuring the burning substance clings to the target (such as the engine compartments of vehicles)—or employing varied ignition mechanisms to increase the device's reliability.
