This is one of philosophy's most enduring questions, with thoughtful people holding different views.

**The case for objective morality** suggests that some moral truths exist independently of what humans think - that torturing innocents for fun would be wrong even if everyone believed otherwise. Proponents point to our strong moral intuitions and the apparent universality of certain values across cultures.

**The case for human-invented morality** argues that morality emerged from our evolution as social beings, shaped by culture and practical needs. The variation in moral codes across societies and the fact that moral beliefs seem to track human interests support this view.

There are also middle positions - perhaps there are some objective moral truths (like unnecessary suffering being bad) while other moral rules are cultural constructions. Or maybe morality is "intersubjective" - not written into the universe, but not arbitrary either, emerging from shared human nature.

I find myself uncertain. The depth of moral conviction we feel seems to point beyond mere convention, yet the tight connection between morality and human flourishing is hard to ignore. What's your intuition - do moral truths feel discovered or created to you?
