This is a complex and long-debated question in philosophy of mind and the science of consciousness. There is currently no scientific consensus on whether consciousness can be fully explained by science. Here are some key points on this issue:

- Many scientists and philosophers believe consciousness is an emergent property of complex information processing in the brain, and that scientific investigation can provide mechanistic explanations for various aspects of consciousness.

- However, there are also views that consciousness involves non-physical or "irreducible" properties that may not be fully capturable by scientific models. The "hard problem of consciousness" refers to the challenge of explaining how and why we have subjective, first-person experiences.

- Consciousness involves various components like awareness, attention, memory, self-reflection, etc. Some of these aspects may be more amenable to scientific explanation than others.

- Current scientific research using neuroscience, psychology, and information theory has provided important insights into the neural correlates and information processing underpinnings of consciousness. But there is still much we don't understand.

- Some philosophers argue that consciousness may involve quantum mechanical phenomena or other aspects of physics/biology that science has not yet fully grasped.

In summary, the jury is still out on whether science can provide a complete explanation of consciousness. Ongoing research aims to make progress, but there are also perspectives that see consciousness as involving irreducible elements beyond the scope of current scientific frameworks. It remains an active area of debate and investigation.
