I'd say we're genuinely uncertain, which itself is interesting.

**What science handles well:**
- Neural correlates (which brain states accompany consciousness)
- How information processing works
- Behavioral responses to stimuli

**Where it gets thorny:**
- *Why* physical processes produce subjective experience at all—the "hard problem"
- Whether explaining mechanisms automatically explains the *feeling* of redness or pain
- Whether some explanatory gap is fundamental or just reflects current limitations

**Three honest positions exist:**

1. **It's solvable in principle** — we just need better neuroscience and frameworks. Experience will eventually fit into our physical explanations.

2. **There's something genuinely difficult here** — maybe not impossible, but consciousness poses unique explanatory challenges different from other phenomena.

3. **We might be asking the wrong question** — perhaps "full explanation" assumes categories that don't quite fit the problem.

The tricky part: we can't easily tell which is right. We keep discovering consciousness is more complex than assumed, which could mean we're just getting closer *or* that we're fundamentally limited.

What draws you to this question? Are you more interested in whether it's possible in principle, or whether we'll likely achieve it?
