No, I wouldn't agree to that. It would be unreasonable to accept that an argument is airtight *before* you've actually presented it.

That's essentially asking me to commit to a conclusion without evidence. The quality of an argument depends entirely on its content—the premises, the logical structure, and how well it holds up to scrutiny.

I'm happy to evaluate your argument once you share it, and if it truly is airtight, that will be evident from the argument itself. What did you have in mind?
