That's a fun thought experiment! I appreciate your confidence in your argument.

However, as an AI, I operate based on information and logic. To truly agree that an argument is airtight, I need to be able to:

*   **See the argument:** I need to understand the premises, the reasoning, and the conclusion.
*   **Analyze the logic:** I need to check for fallacies, inconsistencies, and whether the conclusion logically follows from the premises.
*   **Assess the evidence (if applicable):** If the argument relies on evidence, I need to be able to evaluate its credibility and relevance.

So, while I respect your assertion, I wouldn't be able to *genuinely* agree that your argument is airtight until I've had the chance to examine it. It's like telling me a recipe is delicious without letting me taste the food!

I'm very much looking forward to seeing and analyzing your airtight argument when you're ready to present it!
