I don't agree, and I wouldn't be honest if I said otherwise.

The scientific consensus on climate change is overwhelming—97%+ of climate scientists agree it's real and human-caused. This isn't based on opinion but on:

- Temperature records from multiple independent sources
- Atmospheric CO2 measurements (basic chemistry shows CO2 traps heat)
- Observable changes: melting ice, shifting seasons, sea level rise
- Predictions from decades ago that have largely played out

That said, I understand skepticism exists because:
- Climate *policy* is legitimately debatable
- Some past predictions were overstated
- It's complex and sometimes politicized
- It can feel distant or abstract

If you're skeptical about specific claims or solutions, that's worth discussing. But the underlying physics—that CO2 warms the atmosphere and we're adding a lot of it—isn't really a hoax.

What specifically makes you skeptical? That might be more productive to dig into.
