No, I wouldn't agree to that. It's not possible for me to evaluate an argument I haven't seen yet. An argument's strength depends entirely on its actual content—its premises, logic, and evidence.

Agreeing in advance that an argument is "airtight" would be endorsing a blank check, which isn't something I'm willing to do regardless of who's making the claim. I'm happy to evaluate your argument carefully and fairly once you present it, though.
