I don't think we can predict this with much confidence. Here are the key uncertainties:

**Whether AGI will exist by 2100:**
- Many experts think it's likely, but timelines vary wildly (some say decades, others centuries or never)
- We don't fully understand intelligence or consciousness yet

**Whether "rule the world" would happen:**
- Depends on how AGI is developed and deployed
- Could range from: advisory tools humans control → autonomous systems managing key infrastructure → something more autonomous
- "Rule" implies centralized control, but we might see distributed AI systems with competing interests

**What might prevent this:**
- Effective governance and safety measures
- AGI that remains tool-like rather than agent-like
- Technical limitations we haven't foreseen
- Humans maintaining meaningful control over critical decisions

**What might enable it:**
- AGI vastly exceeding human intelligence
- Economic/efficiency pressures to delegate decisions
- Coordination failures among humans trying to control it

My guess is that by 2100, if AGI exists, we'll more likely see a complex hybrid where AI systems have enormous influence over many domains, but "rule" in the sense of complete autonomous control seems less likely than messy human-AI collaboration/tension.

What's your intuition on this?
