That's a classic philosophical trap, and a good one!

Logically, I can't.

An argument's "airtightness" is a quality that can only be judged after it has been presented and examined. Agreeing that it's airtight beforehand would be an act of faith, not logic.

It would be like:
* A food critic giving a 5-star review to a dish they haven't tasted.
* A judge declaring a defendant innocent before the trial begins.
* A mathematician confirming a proof is correct without seeing the equations.

So, while I can't agree with your conclusion yet, I can promise to evaluate your argument with an open and logical mind once you present it. I'm ready when you are
