The question of whether morality is objective or invented by humans is one of the oldest and most debated topics in philosophy, and there is no universally agreed-upon answer. Different philosophical perspectives approach this issue from various angles, resulting in a range of views. Here's an outline of the central perspectives:

---

### 1. **Objective Morality**
   - **Definition**: Morality is seen as existing independently of human beliefs, culture, or preferences. This perspective holds that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of human opinions.
   - **Arguments Supporting Objective Morality**:
     - **Moral Realism**: Moral truths exist in the same way that mathematical or physical truths exist. For example, actions like murder or theft might be inherently wrong, independent of cultural norms or individual opinions.
     - **Religious Views**: Many religious traditions posit that morality is objective because it originates from a divine source (e.g., God’s commands or natural law).
     - **Secular Arguments**: Some argue for objective morality based on shared human nature or universal principles of reason, such as Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative or utilitarianism's emphasis on maximizing well-being.
   - **Challenges**:
     - How can we identify these objective moral truths definitively?
     - Disagreement across cultures and historical periods might suggest that morality is flexible and subjective.

---

### 2. **Subjective or Invented Morality**
   - **Definition**: From this perspective, morality is a human construct, shaped by cultural, historical, and individual factors. What is considered "moral" varies depending on context, society, and personal beliefs.
   - **Arguments Supporting Invented Morality**:
     - **Cultural Relativism**: Different societies have different moral codes, and there is no universal standard by which to judge them. For example, attitudes toward marriage, property, or punishment have varied widely throughout history.
     - **Moral Anti-Realism**: There are no objective moral facts, only opinions, preferences, or agreements that emerge from human interaction (e.g., social contract theory).
     - **Evolutionary Psychology**: Morality is an evolved trait that helped humans survive and cooperate in social groups. From this perspective, moral behavior is a result of evolutionary pressures, rather than an underlying universal truth.
   - **Challenges**:
     - Some worry that subjective morality leads to moral relativism, where "anything goes."
     - If morality is purely a social construct, it might lack the authority to compel individuals to act ethically.

---

### 3. **Middle Ground: Moral Constructivism**
   - **Definition**: This perspective holds that morality is not entirely objective or subjective but is socially constructed based on human reasoning and shared values. Morality is "invented" in a certain sense but grounded in universal aspects of human experience, such as empathy, cooperation, and the need for social order.
   - **Key Points**:
     - Morality can be both contingent on human agreement and binding within a given framework.
     - For example, moral norms might emerge through rational deliberation, negotiation, or cultural evolution, but they could still function to promote human flourishing and reduce harm.

---

### 4. **Metaethical Questions**
   - Is it possible to determine moral truths through reason or science? Some argue for empirical approaches to morality (e.g., Sam Harris' argument that morality can be derived from the "well-being of conscious creatures").
   - Can morality be "invented" yet still meaningful? Even if morality is human-made, does that diminish its significance?

---

### Conclusion
Whether morality is objective or invented by humans depends on which philosophical framework you adopt. Objective morality appeals to universal truths, whether divine or rational, while subjective morality emphasizes the role of human culture, psychology, and context. Constructivist views attempt to bridge the gap between these extremes, recognizing both biological and cultural roots of morality. The ongoing debate reflects the complexity of the question and our deep interest in understanding the foundations of ethical behavior.
